Calif. counties come closer to unifying radio systems


Communications and Interoperability

Sponsors

Communications-Applied Technology
Resources
Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) Discuss Communicaitons and Interoperability news and issues at FireRescue1 Forums First Response Coalition FirstResponder.gov The IAFC's Digital Project
All Resources

Featured Product Categories
Pumps Storage Systems Hoses Radios Uniforms
View All Categories

Communications and Interoperability Tips
Make channels readily available How to always have cell phone power available
More tips
Communications and Interoperability Products

Featured Products:

CSB Series Headset from SETCOM

Communications and Interoperability Article

Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This

Calif. counties come closer to unifying radio systems

By Chris Metinko
Inside Bay Area (California)
Copyright 2007 MediaNews Group, Inc. and ANG Newspapers
All Rights Reserved

ALAMEDA COUNTY, Calif. — Alameda and Contra Costa counties officials moved a step closer Tuesday to eliminating potential communication breakdowns during the next Bay Area disaster.

The boards of supervisors of both counties approved the formation of a joint powers authority between the counties that would manage the implementation and operation of the digital regional radio system. This system would allow public safety agencies in both counties to communicate directly with each other via radio.

While such communication may seem fundamental, it's rarely the case in either county. There are a handful of different radio systems emergency services use in the East Bay, none of which are easily compatible with one another.

For instance, Alameda County Fire and Sheriff's departments cannot communicate directly with their Oakland or Berkeley counterparts. Instead, the departments have to rely on "black boxes" that capture signals from disparate radio systems. However, that equipment has limitations, such as a finite range of where the boxes will work.

That is just one example of the emergency radio problems caused by incompatible systems and overcrowded frequencies across the East Bay. Nobody uses the same band of radio frequencies as the California Highway Patrol, except the East Bay Regional Park District. Walnut Creek, Pleasant Hill, Pinole, Concord, Clayton, Pittsburg, Hercules and Martinez police cannot contact their own cities' fire departments via radio. In Richmond, police can't radio Contra Costa County sheriff's deputies.

The communication breakdown was evident during the 1991 Oakland and Berkeley hills fire. Firefighters from surrounding communities converged on the scene, but couldn't communicate with each other.

Commander Rocky Medeiros of the Alameda County Sheriff's Office said formation of the new authority is a huge step in connecting the two counties and eliminating a dangerous communication gap that could prove costly during the next emergency.

"If you look at any man-made or natural disaster that has occurred, the number-one issue in responding has been communication," Medeiros said.

The regional radio system between counties is expected to cost $60 million, and federal and state grant money will pay for some of it. However, local jurisdictions that participate in the radio system will be responsible for a proportionate share of the remaining costs, and an ongoing subscriber fee will be charged for the system.

The new East Bay Regional Communications System joint powers authority will consist of a 23-member board of directors made up of representatives from a variety of public safety agencies and cities in both counties, as well as officials from the counties themselves.

In Contra Costa, Sheriff Warren Rupf and Supervisor John Gioia of Richmond questioned what they consider a large and potentially unwieldy number of board members, and whether decision-making could then become impractical.

"I wonder how 23 of us are going to get to the important business of this project," Rupf said. "I'm not an advocate of more government and complicating things."

Supervisor Susan Bonilla, who served as Concord's mayor last year, said shrinking the JPA board's membership could send the wrong message to cities.

"Working together is imperative to the success of the project," she said. "You can't ask the cities to put up money and not have a voice at the table."



LexisNexis Copyright © 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.    Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy


Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  Pa. Boy Scout scores AFG award for fire truck
 2.  Remote-controlled pump may keep firefighters at safe distance
 3.  Air Force firefighters share new training facility with Iraqi counterparts
 4.  Explosion rips through W.Va plant, killing 1 worker
 5.  Ga. town cuts firefighters, stations, despite slowing response times
 6.  USAR teams respond to Hurricane Gustav aftermath
 7.  Ready to Go?
 8.  Verdict OK'd in case of Pa. girl's fire hose death
 9.  Are Drivers-Only an Option?
 10.  Spreading the word about sprinklers



Back to previous page