While banging around our different Facebook pages this weekend, I came across one of those lists for living a better life. You know the lists; they give you several hard-to-argue-with examples of why not to sweat the small stuff and not to take things for granted.
One such item tells you not to worry about things that haven't happened. That made me cringe.
I suspect the meaning is to not be paralyzed by worry. Yet it can just as easily be taken to mean there's no point in preparing for the unlikely.
For a variety of reasons, I'm an unlikely candidate for a heart attack. Still, I'd be a fool not to take preventative steps.
Even more unlikely was a question recently posed over Quora asking if the day will ever come when all career fire departments are replaced by volunteers. You can read the response and add your own here.
I enjoy being a volunteer firefighter and strongly believe that volunteers around the world offer a tremendous service to their communities. That aside, it seems ludicrous that cities like Chicago, Boston or Prague would ever have to rely on volunteers.
But what about cities in the 100,000 to 250,000 population range? I would think those departments are a good deal more vulnerable, and some have already converted.
It is also unlikely that when a tone drops in a volunteer fire department, no one will show up. Yet there's the story of Washington Park, Ill., firefighter Dontay Brooks taking on a fully involved structure fire alone for more than half an hour before help arrived.
Make no mistake, public support for firefighting is eroding — for both career and volunteer firefighting. People don't want to volunteer and they don't want to pay for career departments.
Large and small community-relations efforts can shift public opinion. That is important. More importantly, at least immediately, is finding and backing elected officials who have the guts to stand behind firefighters despite waning public support.
Those who set budgeting priorities need the same conviction as firefighter Dontay Brooks had when he stood alone protecting an exposed structure until help arrived.
Like that house, the fire service is exposed and vulnerable. And if we adapt a "don't worry about what hasn't happened" attitude, we will raise the likelihood that it will.
The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1.com or its staff. If you cannot see comments, try disabling privacy and ad blocking plugins in your browser. All comments must comply with our Member Commenting Policy.
Barbara NewmanMonday, February 24, 2014 1:43:22 PMThis is extremely unsettling and potentially heartbreaking for my son who has wanted to be a firefighter since 9-11. I was in NYC on that horrific day, and the impact on my then 5 year old was life shaping. He was just accepted at The University of New Haven for paramedicine and Fire Science. A very expensive BS degree program. We are investing in his future, and the safety of communities that depend on smart, educated men and women. Perhaps he would have been better off going to school for public policy. Thank you to all who serve.
Bob FalconeMonday, February 24, 2014 4:04:39 PMI hate blanket statements like this "Make no mistake, public support for firefighting is eroding — for both career and volunteer firefighting. People don't want to volunteer and they don't want to pay for career departments". Fact or opinion? Based on what? Maybe where the author lives and works. Can't say it's true in my neck of the woods. While POLITICIANS may say they don't support the fire service, that doesn't always translate to how the PUBLIC feels.
Rick SaagerMonday, February 24, 2014 5:30:29 PMWhy do Fire Departments have to be ran by the government? It is a proven fact that the private sector can do as good of job for less money. Why does the government run all of the wrecker truck service? Can you imagine what it would cost to get your car towed!
Rodd HuberWednesday, February 26, 2014 6:29:00 PMA private sector fire dept that costs less and provides more ? Where?