Make this page my home page

  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!

Lion Apparel Introduces Flame-Resistant, ...

Judge rules for bearded DC firefighters

Safety Columnist
Tom LaBelle
Sponsored by Globe
The Butcher's Bill
Communicating Safety
All Articles

Safety Articles
'Electrical nightmare,' odd construction challenge La. firefighters - 12/03/2008 Federal high-visibility vest rule takes effect - 11/24/2008 2 Philadelphia firefighters hurt as roof collapses - 11/21/2008 Mass. firefighter hurt in fall through floor - 11/19/2008 Foreclosures challenge fire departments - 11/19/2008
More articles
Resources
Face the Facts - NVFC Heart-Healthy Firefighter Resource Guide FirefighterCloseCalls.com A White Paper on Thermal Protective Performance Disparity (PDf), from TenCate SouthernMills BlastInjury.org Cause for Alarm: Interactive Special Feature
All Resources

In partnership with:

Featured Product Categories
Training Materials Specialty Vehicles Suppression Rescue Equipment Consulting and Management
View All Categories
Safety Article

Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This


Judge rules for bearded DC firefighters

Editor's note: How do you feel about the judge's ruling? Have your say in the FireRescue1 Forums or the Member Comments section at the end of the article.

By Sarah Karush
The Associated Press


AP Photo George Widman
Curtis De Veaux poses for a photo in Philadelphia. In a separate court case in 2005, a judge ruled the Muslim firefighter could not wear a beard on the job because of the safety risk.

WASHINGTON, D.C.  — A federal judge on Friday struck down a requirement that firefighters in the District of Columbia be clean-shaven.

A group of firefighters who wear beards for religious reasons first sued in 2001 to challenge the fire department's "grooming policy." That policy was replaced with a safety policy in 2005 that held that beards are not compatible with breathing units because they make it impossible to form a tight seal around the face.

U.S. District Judge James Robertson ruled that the district did not meet its burden of proof under the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act to show that being clean-shaven is required to safely wear a self-contained breathing apparatus, or SCBA.

"Moreover, the Department has conceded that, for the vast majority of firefighter activity, a perfect seal between the face mask and the face is not required for safety," Robertson wrote. "The Department fully concedes that bearded firefighters have worn SCBA units for many years without incident."

Alan Etter, a spokesman for D.C. Fire and EMS, said he was not aware of the ruling but said the department would comply. However, he criticized the idea that a bearded firefighter would be safe. He said some of the plaintiffs had already left the department and those who had not were in non-firefighting roles.

"This fire department will never endanger the lives of firefighters, and this is essentially what this is doing," he said.

But Robertson said the district failed to show that firefighters are more likely to have a mask fit improperly if they have a beard than if they don't.

Robertson said there could be a danger with a negative pressure air purifying respirator, or APR, a lighter-weight device appropriate for longer-term use. When such devices are necessary, he said, firefighters with beards should be reassigned to other duties.

Robertson noted that the District of Columbia is the only local jurisdiction in which the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the law under which the plaintiff sued, can be enforced.

Many fire departments bar or restrict facial hair among firefighters. In 2005, a judge in Philadelphia ruled that a firefighter could not wear a beard on the job, even though his Muslim faith calls for it.



Associated PressCopyright 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  The Things I Carried
 2.  Tenn. volunteer struck while directing traffic
 3.  Ohio fire chief under investigation over alleged shoving
 4.  Firefighters face roadside vest regulations
 5.  Interior Use of Positive Pressure – Part 1
 6.  Federal high-visibility vest rule takes effect
 7.  Vacant buildings boarded up after vagrants blamed in Va. fire
 8.  What's Going On Out There?
 9.  Fla. city settles suit with volunteer firefighters
 10.  Safety of Ohio firefighters put to test by area company