OSHA fines Deutsche Bank contractors $464K for fatal blaze

Related Stories
FDNY family sues Deutsche Bank owner, contractorsN.Y. Deutsche Bank fire probe focuses on contractors

Safety Columnist
Fire Department Safety Officers Association
S.O. Sidelines
A Workplace Culture Based on Safety
All Articles

Safety Articles
Controlling the Unknown - 08/20/2008 Routley urges firefighters to learn lessons from Charleston tragedy at FRI - 08/16/2008 USFA report highlights lack of seat belt use in '07 - 08/11/2008 IAFF study pinpoints reasons behind firefighter injuries - 08/11/2008 A Workplace Culture Based on Safety - 08/06/2008
More articles
Resources
Face the Facts - NVFC Heart-Healthy Firefighter Resource Guide FirefighterCloseCalls.com A White Paper on Thermal Protective Performance Disparity (PDf), from TenCate SouthernMills BlastInjury.org Cause for Alarm: Interactive Special Feature
All Resources

In partnership with:

Featured Product Categories
Suppression Hoods AEDs T-Shirts Water Supply Equipment
View All Categories
Safety Article

Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This

OSHA fines Deutsche Bank contractors $464K for fatal blaze

By Amy Westfeldt
The Associated Press


AP Photo/Eric M. Hazard
The fire that claimed the lives of two firefighters burns in the former Deutsche Bank office building in August.
NEW YORK — The federal government fined two contractors hired to dismantle a condemned ground zero skyscraper $464,500 on Tuesday for more than 40 safety hazards at the building, where two firefighters died in a fire last summer.

The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration issued 19 citations to general contractor Bovis Lend Lease and 25 to subcontractor John Galt Corp. for violations at the former Deutsche Bank tower.

Galt, which was fired a week after the Aug. 18 blaze, was issued $271,500 in fines, while Bovis' fines totaled $193,000. It was the largest fine ever levied against Bovis, a contractor on several high-profile projects in the city including the Time Warner Center and the Sept. 11 memorial.

According to OSHA, the contractors failed to inspect a standpipe that didn't work the day of the fire, depriving firefighters of a water supply to fight the blaze. It also said the contractors allowed construction materials to block emergency stairwells, and that they failed to prevent workers from smoking.

Careless smoking is believed to have started the fire at the building, which has been condemned since the World Trade Center's south tower collapsed into it on Sept. 11, 2001, leaving a trail of toxic debris.

The government bought the 40-story building four years ago to try to take it down; the building has been dismantled to 26 stories, but the project has been delayed by disputes with regulators, several other accidents and the discovery of human remains of Sept. 11 victims.

The fines were more than four times the amounts for which OSHA had cited the contractors previously for work at the site.

Bovis said in a statement Tuesday it "strongly disagrees" with the citations and would appeal.

"Demolition of 130 Liberty Street is one of the most complicated and highly regulated abatement and demolition projects ever in New York City," the company said. "Bovis' work prior to the August 18th incident was proceeding under an approved and closely monitored deconstruction and abatement plan."

A Galt executive didn't immediately return a telephone message Tuesday.

The contractors, hired by the Lower Manhattan Development Corp. rebuilding agency to take the building down, did not have fire extinguishers, emergency exit signs or a fire prevention program, OSHA said. Several scaffolds were erected too close to power lines, guardrails and stair rails were missing, and electrical wires were left exposed, OSHA said.

Most work at the building has been on hold since the fire, although Bovis hired a new subcontractor and presented new safety plans. The LMDC has said work to clean the building's upper floors of toxic dust could begin next month.


Associated PressCopyright 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  Pa. Boy Scout scores AFG award for fire truck
 2.  Remote-controlled pump may keep firefighters at safe distance
 3.  Air Force firefighters share new training facility with Iraqi counterparts
 4.  W.Va city may stop giving mutual aid to volunteers
 5.  D-Block debacle: Emergency communications network stalls
 6.  Explosion rips through W.Va plant, killing 1 worker
 7.  Ga. town cuts firefighters, stations, despite slowing response times
 8.  USAR teams respond to Hurricane Gustav aftermath
 9.  Ready to Go?
 10.  Verdict OK'd in case of Pa. girl's fire hose death