Tenn. departments to bill directly for hazmat response


Hazards and Hazmat

Sponsors

CoBRA, a division of Defense Group, Inc.

Blauer
Resources
BlastInjury.org Discuss Hazards and Hazmat at FireRescue1 Forums Firefighter rehabilitation information and resources at FireRehab.com Mesothelioma Treatment Centers - Firefighters and Asbestos Exposure National Fire Protection Associations Research & Reports
All Resources

Featured Product Categories
Gas Masks Spinal Immobilization Suppression Wireless Communications Rescue Stretchers
View All Categories

Hazards and Hazmat Tips
Guidelines for responding to a radiation emergency Wildland urban interface hazards Hydrogen sulfide gas dangers
More tips
Videos
CSB: Blast Wave in Danvers fireworkfactory
More Videos
Hazards and Hazmat Products

Featured Products:

CoBRA® Command Post

Hazards and Hazmat Article

Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This


Tenn. departments to bill directly for hazmat response

By Randall Higgins
The Chattanooga Times Free Press

CLEVELAND, Tenn. — Both the Cleveland and Bradley County fire departments can begin collecting fees for hazardous materials responses from those who create the problem, or their insurers.

The Cleveland City Council and the Bradley County Commission approved resolutions recently allowing the departments to bill directly the insurer or person responsible for a hazardous-materials incident.

County Emergency Management Agency Director Troy Spence recently explained to the County Commission that the EMA used to bill for the cost of the haz-mat response.

He said he suggested to County Fire and Rescue Chief Dewey Woody that the responsibility go to the fire department, eliminating the middle step.

Cleveland City Manager Janice Casteel told City Council members last week that they also would need to act before the change could take place.

"State law currently requires the EMA to send out those billings unless there's a resolution in place," Ms. Casteel said.

Cleveland Fire Chief Chuck Atchley said billing is not a big problem for most hazardous-materials cleanups.

"Typically, what happens now is we can stabilize the scene and turn it over to a cleanup company. There's very little billing that needs to be done," he said.

"Any materials we use, the cleanup company will reimburse us for those, and they turn around and bill whoever is responsible," Mr. Atchley said.

But with major cleanups that might require more time and materials, the resolutions allow the departments to collect directly, he said.

"It's more of a housekeeping thing," he said of the city resolution.

Copyright 2008 Chattanooga Publishing Company



LexisNexis Copyright © 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.   Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy


Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  'Two-Hatters' Perform Vital Volunteer Role
 2.  Foreclosures challenge fire departments
 3.  Irish firefighters killed in house fire 'lacked proper training'
 4.  Planning group aids training center success
 5.  Thousands evacuate as fires destroy Calif. homes
 6.  Transient ordered to pay $101M for setting Calif. fires
 7.  Fire suppressing 'grenades' battle flames
 8.  Fla. city settles suit with volunteer firefighters
 9.  Safety of Ohio firefighters put to test by area company
 10.  Ohio fire chief under investigation over alleged shoving



Back to previous page