Ammonia leak leads to evacuation at Baltimore icehouse


Hazards and Hazmat

Sponsors

CoBRA, a division of Defense Group, Inc.

Blauer
Resources
BlastInjury.org Discuss Hazards and Hazmat at FireRescue1 Forums Firefighter rehabilitation information and resources at FireRehab.com Mesothelioma Treatment Centers - Firefighters and Asbestos Exposure National Fire Protection Associations Research & Reports
All Resources

Featured Product Categories
Helmets In Vehicle Video Intercoms P25 Radios Extrication Equipment
View All Categories

Hazards and Hazmat Tips
Guidelines for responding to a radiation emergency Wildland urban interface hazards Hydrogen sulfide gas dangers
More tips
Videos
CSB: Blast Wave in Danvers fireworkfactory
More Videos
Hazards and Hazmat Products

Featured Products:

CoBRA® Command Post

Hazards and Hazmat Article

Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This


Ammonia leak leads to evacuation at Baltimore icehouse

By Richard Irwin
The Baltimore Sun

BALTIMORE — An ammonia leak at an old icehouse in West Baltimore caused an evacuation near the building that suffered an extensive fire in 2004.

Homes in the 500 block of N. Pulaski St., less than a block east of the Baltimore American Ice Co. in the 2100 block of W. Franklin St., were evacuated because of the strong odor of ammonia, said Chief Kevin Cartwright, a Fire Department spokesman.

The 15 evacuees were put on warm MTA buses, Cartwright said. One person complained of breathing problems but refused hospital treatment. Other residents in the area received automated phone calls telling them to stay inside and close their windows, Cartwright said.

The leak, which happened about 8:30 p.m., came from an ammonia pipe broken by workers who were tearing down part of the building, Cartwright said. In March 2004, a fire swept through the ice factory, the second major blaze in three years.

Last night, the Fire Department set up a mobile command center at West Saratoga and North Smallwood streets, consulting maps to coordinate the evacuation. Thirty-five pieces of firefighting equipment — including a hazardous-materials unit — and nearly 80 firefighters were on the scene.


LexisNexis Copyright © 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.   Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy


Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  'Two-Hatters' Perform Vital Volunteer Role
 2.  Foreclosures challenge fire departments
 3.  Irish firefighters killed in house fire 'lacked proper training'
 4.  Planning group aids training center success
 5.  Thousands evacuate as fires destroy Calif. homes
 6.  Transient ordered to pay $101M for setting Calif. fires
 7.  Fire suppressing 'grenades' battle flames
 8.  Fla. city settles suit with volunteer firefighters
 9.  Safety of Ohio firefighters put to test by area company
 10.  Ohio fire chief under investigation over alleged shoving



Back to previous page