L.A. police, fire departments defy mayor on cuts


Legislation & Funding

Resources
Discuss Fire Grants and Funding at FireRescue1 Forums Visit FireGrantsHelp.com for grant information and assistance
All Resources

Featured Product Categories
Off Road Rescue In Vehicle Video Water Supply Equipment CPR Ambulances
View All Categories

Legislation & Funding Tips
Leadership and the stages of team development
More tips
Videos
CFSI: Week In Review 11/14/2008
More Videos

Legislation & Funding Article

Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This


L.A. police, fire departments defy mayor on cuts

By Rick Orlov and Rachel Uranga
Daily Breeze

LOS ANGELES — Los Angeles' police and fire departments defied Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's call to cut their budgets for next year and instead proposed major spending increases Tuesday to improve public safety and emergency services.

Commissions that govern the Los Angeles Police Department and Los Angeles Fire Department said they could not submit budget proposals with the 8 percent reduction requested by the mayor without imposing draconian cuts, including layoffs.

Instead, both agencies submitted budget requests to the Mayor's Office that call for increases - $250million more for the LAPD and $72million for the LAFD.

Funding for the agencies represents more than half the city's total general fund budget. If adopted, the Police Department would have a budget of $1.5billion while the Fire Department would have $607million.

"You're going to ask us to take 8percent from our budget," said Fire Commission President Genethia Hudley-Hayes, who noted she is "someone who does oversight of the Fire Department for the city of Los Angeles."

"In good conscience, I can't do that. I won't do that."

City agencies were asked to submit their budget requests by Thursday for the Mayor's Office to review. Villaraigosa, who is scheduled to meet today with general managers, had asked each department to cut back amid a projected $75million shortfall next year.

Spokesman Matt Szabo said the mayor wanted all departments — including police and fire — to follow his directive.

"That being said, the mayor's top priority is public safety," Szabo said. "The budget he submits in April will give priority to police, fire and other critical public-safety services."

Police Commissioner John Mack said the LAPD needs the money in its proposed budget to fund programs required under a federal consent decree and to meet the mayor's goal of reducing crime.

"We as a commission and the public need to recognize, we don't anticipate by any stretch of the imagination this is the final budget," Mack said.

"Given the tight fiscal climate we are operating in, clearly we have to recognize there will be some hard decisions made, there will have to be some trade-offs."

But, he said, the commission believed it needed to also pay for an in-car camera system to monitor officers for incidents of potential excessive force or racial profiling.

"It is important for everyone to understand that the LAPD is going to provide the best services possible, and it takes money to accomplish that," Mack said.

Hayes said the LAFD is coping with demands for massive reform after audits by Controller Laura Chick that found continuing problems with racial and sexual harassment.

At the same time, demands on the Fire Department — particularly emergency medical care — are rising with the closure of the emergency room at King-Harbor Hospital and the shutdown of other hospitals in the region.

Fire Chief Douglas Barry said he has yet to quantify what an 8percent reduction would mean for services and whether any fire stations would have to close.

The LAFD budget was described as already lean, with most of the proposed increases being used for salary boosts and infrastructure improvements.

Added to the city's current fiscal problems is the potential loss of $270million if the city's telephone-users' tax is ruled illegal.

The mayor and City Council have put a measure on the Feb. 5 ballot asking voters to put a 9percent telephone tax into effect.

"If that doesn't pass, it will hurt more than the Fire Department," Barry said. "It will hurt the whole city."

Copyright 2007 ProQuest Information and Learning
All Rights Reserved
ProQuest SuperText
Copyright 2007 Copley Press, Inc.



LexisNexis Copyright © 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.   Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy


Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  'Two-Hatters' Perform Vital Volunteer Role
 2.  Foreclosures challenge fire departments
 3.  Irish firefighters killed in house fire 'lacked proper training'
 4.  Planning group aids training center success
 5.  Thousands evacuate as fires destroy Calif. homes
 6.  Transient ordered to pay $101M for setting Calif. fires
 7.  Fire suppressing 'grenades' battle flames
 8.  Fla. city settles suit with volunteer firefighters
 9.  Safety of Ohio firefighters put to test by area company
 10.  Ohio fire chief under investigation over alleged shoving



Back to previous page