Tax cuts may hurt Fla. firefighters, public services


Legislation & Funding

Related Stories
L.A. police, fire departments defy mayor on cuts

Resources
Discuss Fire Grants and Funding at FireRescue1 Forums
All Resources

Featured Product Categories
Apparel Books Secure Communications Helmet Lights Gas Masks
View All Categories

Legislation & Funding Tips
Leadership and the stages of team development
More tips

Legislation & Funding Article

Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This


Tax cuts may hurt Fla. firefighters, public services

Scott Wyman and John Holland
The Sun-Sentinel

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — Supporters of the tax proposal on this month's ballot clashed with police officers, firefighters and educators Monday over whether the measure would bring meaningful property tax relief or deeply hurt public services.

Schools as well as police and fire protection would be hurt if voters order tax cuts, according to the government officials who addressed a crowd of about 100 gathered for a forum on the ballot initiative at Hallandale High School on Monday night. Earlier in the day, Gov. Charlie Crist and dozens of real-estate agents descended on a west Hollywood neighborhood in a carefully scripted rally backing the amendment.

"This may not go as far as some would like, and it does more than others want, but if you want your property taxes cut, then vote yes on Amendment One," Crist told the gathering, made up almost exclusively of supporters bussed in for the event. "It is that simple."

But Broward County schools Superintendent Jim Notter said the initiative could cost 1,200 jobs. And Plantation Police Chief Larry Massey, who heads the Broward County police chiefs association, said fewer officers are now on the street because of an initial round of tax cuts that the Legislature required last fall. He warned the proposal on the Jan. 29 ballot would reduce protection further.

"This is not the time to take police officers off the street," Massey said during the forum sponsored by the Broward League of Cities.

The proposed constitutional amendment doubles the homestead exemption on all but school taxes and allows people to take their tax breaks with them when they move. The increase in the homestead exemption would save the average Broward homeowner an estimated $308.

State economists estimate that governments in Broward would lose $1.4 billion in revenue over the next five years if the tax proposal passes. Schools would lose $144 million, with the county, cities and special service districts shouldering the rest of the burden.

Government officials say public safety will have to be cut because police and fire service often comprise half of city budgets. And while the increase in homestead exemption would not affect the school system, projections are that it will lose revenue because of portability.

"Don't necessarily do the popular thing, do the responsible thing," said John McNamara, a Sunrise firefighter who spoke for the area's firefighters association.

Notter said the school district favors tax reform, but that the state should do it in a way that does not harm education. He said the school district's costs have increased because of health insurance, property insurance and fuel prices.

"Amendment One does not meet the basic, fundamental test of reasonable, responsible tax reform," he said.

Advocates of the tax package said that while it is not perfect, it is a start.

Property Appraiser Lori Parrish and the head of the Realtors Association of Greater Fort Lauderdale said the proposal will provide a boost to an otherwise stagnant real estate market.

"We are hurting in the Broward economy and in the Florida economy, and we need tax relief," said Richard Barkett of the Realtors Association.

Crist's event was held at the home of Teresa and Anselmo Bonilla, who bought their home on the 6400 block of Coolidge Street in 2004 but would like to downsize to save money. Anselmo Bonilla said the family can't afford to move because buying another home would raise their property taxes.

Most of the legislation is directed at homeowners even though there is a cut proposed in the tax on business equipment and a cap of 10 percent on how much the tax value of commercial and non-homesteaded residential property can increase each year.

Copyright 2008 Sun-Sentinel Company
All Rights Reserved



LexisNexis Copyright © 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.    Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy


Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  Mistrial declared in San Diego gay pride parade case
 2.  Fla. firefighters protest over EMS role
 3.  Bulletproof vests – the next PPE for firefighters?
 4.  Ariz. department shifts focus of fitness routine
 5.  Pa. firefighter reinstated by arbitrator
 6.  Vision 20/20: A national strategy for reducing fire loss
 7.  Tactical Approaches for Chimney Fires
 8.  Christian drama 'Fireproof' has unexpected success
 9.  Spreading the word about sprinklers
 10.  Fla. city settles suit with volunteer firefighters



Back to previous page