Make this page my home page

  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!

MagneGrip Filter Helps Firehouses Go Green

Editorial: How 9/11's dust settled


Mass Casualty Incidents

Resources
Bioterrorism and Other Public Health Emergencies: Altered Standards of Care in Mass Casualty Events Department of Health and Human Services — Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Mass Casualty Event Preparedness and Response Discuss Mass Casualty Incidents, WMDs, and NIMS at FireRescue1 Forums Federation of American Scientists: Multi Casualty Incident Response Training for Firefighters First Response Coalition
All Resources

Featured Product Categories
T-Shirts Prevention Mobile Data Hazmat Equipment Headsets
View All Categories

Videos
Technical Rescue Technician training class
More Videos

Mass Casualty Incidents Article

Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This


Editorial: How 9/11's dust settled

The Star-Ledger (Newark, New Jersey)
Copyright 2007 Newark Morning Ledger Co.
All Rights Reserved

It is clear that Christie Whitman and other officials didn't do nearly enough to warn people of the pollution danger after the collapse of the World Trade Center. And the government still isn't doing enough to protect people in Lower Manhattan from 9/11's toxic legacy.

Those conclusions are not new. But their truth was poignantly highlighted at yesterday's lengthy congressional hearing on the toxic fallout of the Sept. 11 attacks.

At one point, Rep. Bill Pascrell, a New Jersey Democrat, told Whitman, the Environmental Protection Agency administrator at the time of the attacks, that she should read the reports from Mt. Sinai Medical Center and elsewhere on the health fallout from the collapse of the Twin Towers.

The medical reports, and a growing number of cases of death and illness, prove that the government botched its duty to protect the public. The illness and suffering of police officers, firefighters, apartment dwellers and office workers show that Whitman and others were horribly mistaken when they concluded that the air was safe in the days after 9/11, but said little about dust and soot.

Yes, the science did seem to show that airborne levels of asbestos and other toxic substances were not terribly high for the most part, particularly if someone wasn't directly on a huge debris pile at Ground Zero.

But Whitman and a host of other officials at the federal, state and local levels all but ignored giving the public any effective warnings about the lingering effects of contaminated dust and soot. The powder from the fall and conflagration of the towers was highly polluted. It infiltrated windows, heating and air conditioning systems and every conceivable nook and cranny for blocks around the Trade Center site.

Yet the EPA didn't hammer home the need for the skilled cleanup of homes, offices and schools, even though Whitman and other officials quickly saw to it that the agency's own building near the Twin Towers was thoroughly decontaminated. Instead, the public tone was one of reassurance. Whitman, a former governor of New Jersey, seems genuinely to believe the EPA did the best it could, that the confident tone was justified by the science at the time.

The mounting medical evidence shows that the reassurances were optimistic at best. The evidence shows Washington still needs to help clean up buildings in Lower Manhattan, still needs to expand funding for medical tracking and services for those coming down with 9/11-related maladies.

The people who really need to read the medical reports Pascrell mentioned are currently at the EPA and the White House. 



LexisNexis Copyright © 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.   Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy


Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  Federal high-visibility vest rule takes effect
 2.  The Things I Carried
 3.  Interior Use of Positive Pressure – Part 1
 4.  Vacant buildings boarded up after vagrants blamed in Va. fire
 5.  Fla. city settles suit with volunteer firefighters
 6.  Safety of Ohio firefighters put to test by area company
 7.  Ohio fire chief under investigation over alleged shoving
 8.  Mo. chief says FD conflict still about race
 9.  Heads bow in memory of 9/11 victims
 10.  Six years later, 9/11 first responder illnesses still on rise



Back to previous page