Make this page my home page

  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!

MagneGrip Filter Helps Firehouses Go Green

Ailing 9/11 workers sue $1B World Trade Center insurance fund for sick pay


Mass Casualty Incidents

Resources
Bioterrorism and Other Public Health Emergencies: Altered Standards of Care in Mass Casualty Events Department of Health and Human Services — Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Mass Casualty Event Preparedness and Response Discuss Mass Casualty Incidents, WMDs, and NIMS at FireRescue1 Forums Federation of American Scientists: Multi Casualty Incident Response Training for Firefighters First Response Coalition
All Resources

Featured Product Categories
Hoses Emergency Lighting Rope Rescue Patient Handling Leather Helmet Fronts
View All Categories

Videos
Technical Rescue Technician training class
More Videos

Mass Casualty Incidents Article

Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This


Ailing 9/11 workers sue $1B World Trade Center insurance fund for sick pay

By Amy Westfeldt
The Associated Press

NEW YORK — Ailing ground zero workers went to court Tuesday to demand that the company overseeing a $1 billion Sept. 11 insurance fund spend the money to pay for their health care.

The workers have already filed a class action lawsuit claiming the toxic dust from the World Trade Center site gave them serious, sometimes fatal diseases. On Tuesday, they sought compensation from the WTC Captive Insurance Co., the company in charge of money appropriated by Congress to deal with Sept. 11 health-related claims.

"The WTC Captive has consistently refused to pay any of the ground zero workers who have become ill on the work site, including any compensation" for lost salaries, pain and suffering, medical treatment, medical monitoring or burial expenses, according to the lawsuit, filed in state Supreme Court in Manhattan.

It was filed by attorneys representing thousands who became ill after working to clean up the site while breathing toxic trade center dust, including more than 100 who have died.

"She hasn't paid a penny to one of my 10,000 people," David Worby, an attorney representing the workers, said of the company's CEO, Christine LaSala. "It was their mandate."

Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who was named in the suit along with LaSala and board members, said Tuesday that attorneys are wrong about the company's structure.

"They just don't know the facts. The truth of the matter is, Congress didn't set up a victims' compensation fund," the mayor said. "We'd like them to do that, we've asked for that; they set up a captive insurance company. And the insurance company can only pay out monies if somebody sues us in court and wins a judgment against us."

The lawsuit, relying on testimony from federal officials over the years about the fund's purpose, said officials meant for the money to be used to compensate ailing workers.

The company said in a statement Tuesday that the lawsuit was "completely without merit" and that WTC Captive has been operating as the federal government intended it, insuring the city and its contractors from Sept. 11 claims.

Since it began operating in 2004, the company has spent more than $73 million of the insurance money in legal fees and other expenses, the lawsuit says.

Worby and other attorneys plan to go to Washington this week to lobby congressional leaders to urge the company to make the $1 billion available immediately for sick workers.

Bloomberg and other city officials have estimated the cost of caring for the workers who are sick or who could become sick at $393 million a year and urged the federal government to pay for their treatment and monitoring.

___

Associated Press writer Sara Kugler contributed to this report.



Associated PressCopyright 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  Federal high-visibility vest rule takes effect
 2.  The Things I Carried
 3.  Interior Use of Positive Pressure – Part 1
 4.  Vacant buildings boarded up after vagrants blamed in Va. fire
 5.  Fla. city settles suit with volunteer firefighters
 6.  Safety of Ohio firefighters put to test by area company
 7.  Ohio fire chief under investigation over alleged shoving
 8.  Mo. chief says FD conflict still about race
 9.  Heads bow in memory of 9/11 victims
 10.  Six years later, 9/11 first responder illnesses still on rise



Back to previous page