Make this page my home page

  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!

MagneGrip Filter Helps Firehouses Go Green

Agency: Ga. sugar refinery deaths preventable


Mass Casualty Incidents

Related Stories
Federal inspections launched following Ga. sugar refinery blast Cause of Ga. sugar refinery fire determined

Resources
Bioterrorism and Other Public Health Emergencies: Altered Standards of Care in Mass Casualty Events Department of Health and Human Services — Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Mass Casualty Event Preparedness and Response Discuss Mass Casualty Incidents, WMDs, and NIMS at FireRescue1 Forums Federation of American Scientists: Multi Casualty Incident Response Training for Firefighters First Response Coalition
All Resources

Featured Product Categories
Gas Detection Vehicle Seating Administration and Billing Leather Accessories Emergency Lighting
View All Categories

Videos
Technical Rescue Technician training class
More Videos

Mass Casualty Incidents Article

Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This


Agency: Ga. sugar refinery deaths preventable

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The blast that killed 12 workers at a Georgia sugar refinery last month could have been prevented if widely recognized safeguards had been required by federal regulations, the head of the U.S. Chemical Safety Board said Wednesday.

"These are preventable events," CSB director William Wright told the House Education and Labor Committee. He called for tough rules aimed at preventing the buildup of combustible dust and its exposure to sparks.

"A comprehensive dust standard will save lives," Wright said.

The CSB completed a study two years ago of 281 dust fires and explosions that caused 119 deaths and more than 718 injuries at U.S. businesses. It sent recommendations for new regulations to the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Committee Chairman George Miller (D-Calif.) and Rep. John Barrow (D-Ga.) introduced legislation last week that would require OHSA to issue new regulations for combustible industrial dusts.

The legislation followed by one month the Feb. 7 explosion that killed a dozen workers and critically injured 11 others at the Imperial Sugar Co. in Port Wentworth, near Savannah. Barrow represents the congressional district where the explosion took place.

"We owe it to the victims of last month's tragedy --- and to all the other victims before that --- to do what we can to prevent this sort of thing from ever happening again," Barrow testified. "What's needed is the will to act, and if [OSHA] won't do it, we need to get going ourselves."

There are an estimated 80,000 factories and other facilities where potentially combustible dusts can be created from sugar, sulfur, coal, wood, plastics, flour or other commodities.

OSHA has enforced rules governing the handling of such dusts for more than 40 years, the agency's assistant secretary, Edwin Foulke, testified. He said the agency applies "tough standards" meant to keep facilities clean and well ventilated, to train workers in hazardous conditions and emergency plans, and to protect against the accumulation of combustible dust in places where it could ignite.

OSHA critics, however, said the agency's regulations don't go far enough and that many OSHA standards are conveyed as suggestions rather than requirements.

"We have good standards that aren't mandatory and inadequate standards that are mandatory," said Barrow. Further, he said, "there aren't enough inspectors or cops on the beat."

Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.) also testified before the committee, urging caution in putting together additional regulations.

"We want to act quickly on this because you want to prevent this from happening elsewhere," said Kingston.

He stopped short of endorsing Barrow's bill, however, saying it takes a "one-size-fits-all approach" to a complicated industrial challenge.


LexisNexis Copyright © 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.   Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy


Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  Federal high-visibility vest rule takes effect
 2.  The Things I Carried
 3.  Interior Use of Positive Pressure – Part 1
 4.  Vacant buildings boarded up after vagrants blamed in Va. fire
 5.  Fla. city settles suit with volunteer firefighters
 6.  Safety of Ohio firefighters put to test by area company
 7.  Ohio fire chief under investigation over alleged shoving
 8.  Mo. chief says FD conflict still about race
 9.  Heads bow in memory of 9/11 victims
 10.  Six years later, 9/11 first responder illnesses still on rise



Back to previous page