Sprinkler system was turned off before Va. apartment fire


Fire Prevention

Resources
Home Fire Sprinkler Coalition Juvenile Firesetter Resource Guide NFPA Fire Prevention The Institution of Fire Engineers
All Resources

Featured Product Categories
Dispatch Equipment Sirens and Alarms Foam Equipment Wildland Lifting Systems
View All Categories

Fire Prevention Tips
How make your open house successful
More tips
Videos
NFPA: Fire Prevention Week Building Code blamed for massive Canada Fire Christmas tree fires... Sprinkler Demonstration
More Videos

Fire Prevention Article

Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This


Sprinkler system was turned off before Va. apartment fire

By Aaron Applegate
The Virginian-Pilot

VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. — Two employees of the apartment complex that caught fire Tuesday were charged Thursday with failing to notify the Fire Department that they had turned off the building's sprinkler system earlier in the day, an action officials said allowed the blaze to grow much bigger.

About 50 people were displaced by the fire at Marina Shores Apartment Homes, which destroyed 11 units and forced tenants to leave 13 others, said Reta Lane, regional manager of the complex. No one was hurt.

The maintenance supervisor and site manager turned off the sprinkler system in the building around 11:30 a.m. after a tenant complained of a leak, said Battalion Chief David Hutcheson, spokesman for the Virginia Beach Fire Department.

Minutes after the fire started around 4:30 p.m., the employees turned the sprinkler system back on, but it was too late, Hutcheson said. A smoldering cigarette or cigar in an ash tray on a balcony started the blaze, he said.

The two employees, whom Fire Department officials wouldn't name, are scheduled to be in court Jan. 31. Each faces a pair of Class I misdemeanor charges: failure to maintain a fire suppression system and failure to notify the Fire Department when a system is taken out of service, both violations of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code.

The employees left a message with a private firm that oversees the complex's sprinkler systems that they turned them off, but did not contact the Fire Department, Lane said.

"That was the step that was missed," she said. "It boils down to training your people. I hope everybody in the industry will take this as a lesson. The chances were a million to one, and unfortunately it got us."

Copyright 2008 Landmark Communications, Inc.
All Rights Reserved



LexisNexis Copyright © 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.    Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy


Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  Judge: 4 firefighters not needed on Ind. city's trucks
 2.  Cultural Change: Just Do It
 3.  Firefighters face roadside vest regulations
 4.  Time to be Heroes
 5.  Pa. firefighter reinstated by arbitrator
 6.  Radios put firefighters' lives at risk, says Pa. chief
 7.  Thomas Carr named Charleston fire chief
 8.  Calif. firefighters want toll-free bridge passage
 9.  Fla. firefighters protest over EMS role
 10.  Spreading the word about sprinklers



Back to previous page