How to Evaluate Heavy Rescue Tool Systems


Rescue

Sponsors

Sterling Rope
Resources
Discuss Extrication and Rescue issues and news at FireRescue1 Forums Fire and Rescue Training with Midsouth Rescue Technologies FirefighterHourly.com Online EMS Resource - EMS1.com Transportation Emergency Rescue Committee USA
All Resources

Featured Product Categories
Extrication Equipment Hoods Vehicles Emergency Lighting Scheduling Software
View All Categories

Rescue Tips
Get a Grip! Be prepared for the unexpected before the battle begins Portable water extinguishers are effective tool during fire attack Portable ladders serve many purposes when used safely Search for fire victims with safety in mind
More tips
Videos
Amazing House Rescue Flash Flood Rescue
More Videos
Rescue Products

Featured Products:

PMI Deluxe Hot X-It Kit

Rescue Article

Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This


How to Evaluate Heavy Rescue Tool Systems

By Ron Shaw
Extrication.com  

Also read 'Considerations for Purchasing Heavy Rescue Tools'

Whenever you compare rescue tools, it is important to do so under the same conditions, utilizing the same vehicle parts or similar type vehicles/parts. Or, as my generation would say, compare "apples to apples."

When your committee has narrowed down its selection to two tool manufacturers, choose prop vehicles that will not allow any tool an advantage over the other due to deformity or corrosion. Evaluators mark cut locations in advance, and techniques and tool positions are mirrored exactly to ensure consistency.

Your committee should make an evaluation check sheet list of materials that need to be tested with the tools for compatibility.

If your evaluators are going to cut a pillar as one of the evaluations for comparison with a similar tool, each tool should cut at the same location on the same or similar vehicle, or use similar dimensional material.

As a guide, the following are recommended points to be incorporated in your agency's evaluation check sheet:

  • Date and evaluators
  • Tool manufacturer
  • Type tool (combi-tool, dedicated cutter/spreader, or ram)
  • Type power unit
    o Make, and model engine/motor rating
    o Fuel/power supply
  • Type hydraulic fluid
  • Type couplers 
  •  Type hose lines 
  •  Low/high pressure system
  • Maximum cutting force 
  •  Maximum cutter opening
  •  Maximum spreading force
  •  Maximum spread opening
  • Maximum pulling force
  •  Operational weight of the rescue tool
  • Dimensions (length, width and height) 
  •  Maximum length extended (ram)
  • Maximum length extended with attachment (ram) 
  • Specific materials to cut
    o Car pillars (A, B and Rear), diameter, and noting make model and year
    o Solid steel bar
    o Boron steel (make and model vehicle)
    o Roof rails
  • Recorded times
    o Time to setup system
    o Total time to make a full cut
    o Time to displace/remove a door
     Displace pin side
     Displace hinge side
     Total door removal (pin & hinge)
  • Operational times
     Battery pack (usable tool time)
     Battery recharge time
     IC engine run time on a tank of fuel 
  •  Pass/Fail

When considering the length of hose line, the most common length would be 30', which is a standard length. If you are choosing mounted reels with 100' lines, ask your sales representative to allow you to test a particular system with a 100' line as well as a 30' section to see if there is a difference in performance between the two.

If your evaluators feel a specific tool has not met your needs or the standards you have established, then they can mark it as fail. However, they should provide a reasoning to bring back to the other committee members. Departments may have different specifications than those implied by a manufacuturer. Your documentation will be beneficial when addressing issues with the manufacturer.

It is important that there is consistency between evaluations. I suggest having a minimum of two sets of evaluations for the same tool. Keep the same evaluation teams throughout the entire tool selecting process, and alternate the tool system for the second set with your evaluation teams. This will offer you a non-biased evaluation averaging out times and weighing out comments from your evaluators during the elimination process.

Not all vendors resort to bait and switch, but it does happen. It is important to specify in your bid tender that you want brand name components, such as hydraulic lines. If not, a vender may substitute a generic hose line for tool brand you are purchasing. This would be a significant saving to the vendor, especially if pricing out at a brand name list price for your hose lines. 

Ron Shaw was a career fire service lieutenant with more than 29 years of service, and is the founder and lead instructor for Extrication.com. The organization is dedicated to the specialty field of motor vehicle extrication, providing emergency responders with the latest training and safety information necessary to safely mitigate a motor vehicle rescue. It has taught vehicle extrication at the basic, intermediate and advanced training skills to emergency responders from four continents and in the United States coast to coast and border to border. For more details, email info@extrication.com.



Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  Mistrial declared in San Diego gay pride parade case
 2.  Seat belts save St. Louis firefighters in crash
 3.  Bulletproof vests – the next PPE for firefighters?
 4.  Tactical Approaches for Chimney Fires
 5.  FBI investigates Fla. fire inspectors' links to sprinkler company
 6.  Christian drama 'Fireproof' has unexpected success
 7.  Hybrid Hazards Present New Challenges
 8.  Fla. city settles suit with volunteer firefighters
 9.  Safety of Ohio firefighters put to test by area company
 10.  Ohio fire chief under investigation over alleged shoving



Back to previous page