N.Y. dept. to purchase chemical detector with grant


Technology

Resources
California Fire Technology Directors Association Discuss Technology news and issues at FireRescue1 Forums National Fire Protection Associations Research & Reports NIST Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) and Smokeview The IAFC's Digital Project
All Resources

Featured Product Categories
Record Management Emergency Response Software Gas Masks Rope Rescue Helmet Lights
View All Categories

Technology Tips
How to always have cell phone power available
More tips

Technology Article

Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This

N.Y. dept. to purchase chemical detector with grant

By Catie O'Toole
The Post-Standard

OSWEGO, N.Y. — Oswego city firefighters soon will be getting a $30,935 piece of equipment that will help them figure out whether they're dealing with any hazardous chemicals.

"You can take this piece of equipment and put it up against a bottle of Excedrin, and in less than a minute, the screen will tell you it contains aspirin, acetaminophen and caffeine," said city fire Lt. Justin Norfleet. "That way, you can immediately rule out that it's a dangerous chemical."

Firefighters also will be able to take it into "hot zones" and identify the chemicals right there, instead of having to send a sample to a laboratory and wait for the results, Norfleet said.

"It's pretty cool," he said. "I've been trained on it and it's a phenomenal piece of equipment. It allows us, in hazardous materials or weapons of mass destruction environment, to determine the exact chemicals quickly."

The Department of Homeland Security awarded $71,072.74 in grants to improve the safety and efficiency of local fire and police departments in Oswego, Clinton, Oneida, St. Lawrence and Essex counties, Rep. John M. McHugh, R-Pierrepont Manor, announced last week.

Of that, the Oswego department was awarded the biggest chunk - $30,935.80 - for the chemical detection kit.

Norfleet said the kit will help firefighters do their jobs faster and safer.

"We can clear incidents more quickly and we can proceed more safely by knowing exactly what we're dealing with," he said.

 

Copyright 2007 Post-Standard
All Rights Reserved.



LexisNexis Copyright © 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.    Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy


Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  Remote-controlled pump may keep firefighters at safe distance
 2.  Pa. Boy Scout scores AFG award for fire truck
 3.  Air Force firefighters share new training facility with Iraqi counterparts
 4.  Explosion rips through W.Va plant, killing 1 worker
 5.  Ga. town cuts firefighters, stations, despite slowing response times
 6.  USAR teams respond to Hurricane Gustav aftermath
 7.  Ready to Go?
 8.  Verdict OK'd in case of Pa. girl's fire hose death
 9.  Are Drivers-Only an Option?
 10.  Spreading the word about sprinklers



Back to previous page