Californians didn't protect homes from wildfires


Wildland-Urban Interface

Sponsors

Consumer Fire Products
Resources
Firewise InterfaceSouth National Interagency Fire Center SLIVIS: Wildland-Urban Interface Take the FireRescue1 2008 Wildland Fire Season Survey!
All Resources

Featured Product Categories
Vehicle Equipment Radios Batteries Incident Analysis Software Extrication Equipment
View All Categories

Wildland-Urban Interface Tips
Common denominators of wildfire behavior Escape routes in wildfires Managing vehicle traffic in smoke
More tips
Videos
Consumer Fire Products FOAMSAFE Exterior Fire Protection System
More Videos
Wildland-Urban Interface Products

Featured Products:

Protect your Property with FOAMSAFE from Consumer Fire Products

Wildland-Urban Interface Article

Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This

Californians didn't protect homes from wildfires

The Associated Press

CORRALITOS, Calif. — Owners of nearly 90% of the structures destroyed in last month's wildfire in the Santa Cruz Mountains did not properly clear flammable brush from the property, state fire officials say.

California law requires property owners in forested areas to remove or reduce most vegetation within 100 feet of a building.

But a state report released last week found that most of the 132 structures destroyed by the fire had "poor defensible space quality." That figure includes 63 homes and 69 outbuildings destroyed in the mountains above Watsonville.

Fire officials say it's likely that fewer homes would have been destroyed if homeowners had complied with a state requirement to remove grasses and trees near buildings.

"I would think that there would be less damage, but it's tough to say," said Kay Price, a battalion chief with the state Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. "Bottom line is that homes that have defensible space stand a much better chance in a wildland fire than homes that don't."

Officials cite a number of reasons why homeowners don't comply with the law, including the desire to keep their homes hidden and concerns about harming the natural landscape.

Earlier this year, Cal Fire mailed out 2,500 notices to residents in Santa Cruz and San Mateo Counties notifying them of the law, but officials acknowledge they only reached a small fraction of homeowners in the region because of staffing and time constraints.

"We do as much as we can, but it's ultimately up to the individual homeowners," said John Ferreira, the state Cal Fire unit chief who oversees firefighting efforts in Santa Cruz and San Mateo counties.

The Santa Cruz County Planning Department also estimates that at least half of the structures in the area were built illegally, which makes it harder to make sure residents are complying with fire safety laws.



Associated PressCopyright 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  Rural volunteer departments struggle for members
 2.  Are Drivers-Only an Option?
 3.  Spreading the word about sprinklers
 4.  Fla. city settles suit with volunteer firefighters
 5.  Safety of Ohio firefighters put to test by area company
 6.  Ohio fire chief under investigation over alleged shoving
 7.  Mo. chief says FD conflict still about race
 8.  Heads bow in memory of 9/11 victims
 9.  Six years later, 9/11 first responder illnesses still on rise
 10.  Swifter NIOSH response to firefighter deaths is urged by feds



Back to previous page