Governors get final Tahoe fire report


Wildfire Prevention

Resources
Firewise National Interagency Fire Center Take the FireRescue1 2008 Wildland Fire Season Survey!
All Resources

Featured Product Categories
Training Materials Off Road Rescue Radios Spinal Immobilization Communications
View All Categories

Wildfire Prevention Tips
Common denominators of wildfire behavior
More tips

Wildfire Prevention Article

Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This


Governors get final Tahoe fire report

The Associated Press


AP Photo/Jeff Chiu
A firefighter waters down trees and brushes in a residential area where homes burned down in the Angora in June last year.
SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, Calif. — Emergency declarations for five counties ringing Lake Tahoe were signed Tuesday by California and Nevada governors to help speed fire-protection efforts in the scenic mountain resort area hit by a catastrophic blaze last summer.

The declarations were among more than 70 recommendations by a special panel formed by California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Nevada Gov. Jim Gibbons after the Angora Fire destroyed 254 homes and caused $140 million in property damage in South Lake Tahoe.

"We will not rest until this natural crown jewel is as safe as it is beautiful," Schwarzenegger said prior to the signings that affect California's El Dorado and Placer counties and Nevada's Carson City, Douglas and Washoe counties.

"Many of these recommendations can be implemented swiftly, and I hope that everyone with the power to make these changes does so quickly," Gibbons said, referring to the California-Nevada Basin Fire Commission's report.

U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who joined the governors, commission members and firefighters at the conference, said that saving Lake Tahoe "is going to be a continuing work in progress. One thing is clear, it's not going to be done in 10 years, it will be ongoing."

The fire commission wants the state and federal governments to free up money quickly, primarily to cut thick stands of trees. Many of its recommendations are intended to resolve the bureaucratic infighting among overlapping agencies that has hampered fire-prevention efforts for years.

The report also recommended higher taxes for property owners, requiring home owners to replace wood shingles and upgrading the Tahoe basin's water systems, which together could cost more than $300 million over 20 years.

The commission said thinning overgrown forests around communities should be completed within five years and within a decade throughout the entire Tahoe basin.

The Angora Fire exposed long-standing rivalries between the local, state, federal and regional agencies that are charged with protecting Tahoe's environment or promoting fire protection.

A recent report by The Associated Press exposed numerous examples of bureaucratic backbiting that delayed tree clearing throughout the basin, sometimes for years. More than 4,000 pages of internal documents from numerous agencies illustrated a dysfunctional planning and fire-prevention process.

The commission's report focused on two agencies at the core of the criticism: the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and California's Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board. Both agencies have tended to make fire protection secondary to environmental protection, in particular trying to maintain the lake's clarity.

They now must recognize that in just a matter of days a wildfire can undo years of environmental progress, sending black ash and barren soil streaming into the lake, the commission said.

It recommended the Lahontan water board and the regional planning agency update their policies to emphasize tree clearing, "with the priority given to protection of life, property and the environment, in that order."

The commission's report also says the various agencies must set aside their often conflicting goals and begin cooperating.

Among the commission's recommendations:

  • The process to obtain tree-cutting permits must be streamlined.
  • Expensive improvements must be undertaken, such as increasing the capacity of the basin's water systems to better fight fires, which would cost more than $100 million and likely take 20 years.
  • Homeowners should be required to replace flammable wooden or shake-shingle roofs, which should be done within 10 years.
  • Local governments should consider taxing property owners in the basin to pay for fire-prevention programs.


Associated PressCopyright 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Print Talk BackRegister RSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  Mistrial declared in San Diego gay pride parade case
 2.  Fla. firefighters protest over EMS role
 3.  Bulletproof vests – the next PPE for firefighters?
 4.  Ariz. department shifts focus of fitness routine
 5.  Pa. firefighter reinstated by arbitrator
 6.  Vision 20/20: A national strategy for reducing fire loss
 7.  Tactical Approaches for Chimney Fires
 8.  Christian drama 'Fireproof' has unexpected success
 9.  Spreading the word about sprinklers
 10.  Fla. city settles suit with volunteer firefighters



Back to previous page