Behind the mask: Uncovering the root causes of mental health challenges in the fire service

The following article was submitted for the 2025 Fire Service Thought Leadership Essay Contest, focused on understanding the “why” behind mental health challenges in the fire service. This article received the first-place honor in the contest, which is managed by Darley, in partnership with the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation (NFFF).

Read past essays and learn how to submit your own essay.

By Captain Marc Wysocki

As a volunteer officer witnessing the evolution of our profession, I’ve observed a troubling paradox: despite increased awareness and resources devoted to firefighter mental health, the rates of PTSD, depression, and suicide continue to rise (1). The question we must confront isn’t simply what mental health challenges exist in the fire service, but why they persist with such devastating impact. Are firefighters truly unique in our vulnerability to mental health challenges, or have we created this narrative as part of our distinct cultural identity?

This essay examines the complex interplay of factors that create unique mental health vulnerabilities for firefighters, explores why traditional approaches to addressing them have fallen short, and proposes innovative solutions that challenge our fundamental assumptions about what it means to be a firefighter.

The invisible weight: Beyond trauma exposure

While exposure to traumatic events is the most visible contributor to mental health challenges, research suggests trauma alone doesn’t explain the disproportionate rates of psychological distress among firefighters compared to other high-stress professions (2). The fire service creates a perfect storm of contributing factors that amplify vulnerability.

I witnessed this firsthand when my friend a firefighter/paramedic—a 20-year veteran respected for his unwavering composure—broke down after a seemingly routine medical call involving an elderly patient. It wasn’t the severity of the incident that affected him, but rather the accumulation of thousands of calls, sleepless nights, and the constant weight of responsibility that finally became unbearable. His experience illustrates how firefighters’ mental health challenges stem not just from individual traumatic events but from unique systemic factors that distinguish our profession from other high-stress occupations.

Trapped in tradition: The culture of emotional suppression

The fire service cultivates a distinct environment where emotional control is equated with professional competence (3). Unlike the general workforce, where emotional expression has become increasingly acceptable, firefighting maintains a culture where vulnerability remains taboo. This isn’t merely cultural preference—it’s an adaptive response to operational demands that creates maladaptive psychological consequences.

Research has found that firefighters who conform most strictly to traditional masculine norms of emotional stoicism report significantly higher levels of psychological distress and are less likely to seek help (4). This culture creates a dangerous cycle: those most deeply embedded in fire service culture become most vulnerable to its psychological risks while simultaneously being least likely to seek assistance.

We must ask ourselves: Does operational effectiveness truly require emotional suppression, or have we conflated these concepts to our detriment? Military special operations—perhaps the closest parallel to firefighting in terms of stress exposure—have increasingly embraced psychological processing as essential to operational readiness, challenging our assumption that stoicism equals strength (18).

Identity fusion and the uniform effect

Firefighters experience what psychologists term “identity fusion” — a merging of personal and professional identities more complete than in most other professions (5). This fusion creates unique vulnerabilities:

• When your self-concept is inseparable from your role as a rescuer, experiencing helplessness at an emergency scene doesn’t just represent a professional limitation — it threatens your fundamental sense of self.
• The uniform and badge become external symbols of an internal identity, creating pressure to maintain the image associated with these symbols even when off-duty.
• The heroic narrative externally imposed creates what researchers term a “comparative suffering” mindset where firefighters minimize their own struggles because “others have it worse” (6).

Recent studies indicate that this identity fusion explains why career-ending injuries and retirement trigger profoundly deeper psychological distress in firefighters than comparable transitions in other professions (7).

I’ve observed this phenomenon during a few peer support sessions, where firefighters consistently measure their suffering against the victims they encounter. A firefighter once told me, “How can I complain about nightmares when that family loses everything?” This comparative suffering mindset creates a uniquely firefighter barrier to help-seeking that isn’t present in many other professions.

The interrupted recovery cycle

The neurobiological impact of the firefighter work cycle creates a distinct pattern of stress response unlike most other professions:

• Anticipatory stress: The hypervigilance required during shift work keeps cortisol levels elevated, preventing full physiological recovery (8).
• Alert–response–return pattern: The repeated cycle of emergency response creates what researchers term “recovery debt” — a cumulative deficit in the body’s ability to return to baseline (9).
• Sleep disruption: The combination of shift work and midnight calls creates chronically disrupted sleep architecture, which research now recognizes as a causal factor in mood disorders, not merely a symptom (10).

A landmark study found that firefighters’ cortisol patterns show chronically elevated levels even during off-duty periods, indicating a failure to achieve physiological recovery that compounds over a career (11).

The firehouse paradox: Support system or stress amplifier?

The firehouse environment represents both a potential solution and a contributing factor to mental health challenges.

Emotional contagion in close quarters

The extended time firefighters spend together creates what psychologists term “emotional contagion” — the unconscious transfer of emotional states between individuals (12). This creates a unique vulnerability:

• Negative coping mechanisms spread through crews more readily than in professions with less interpersonal contact.
• A single member’s unaddressed trauma can affect the entire crew’s psychological well-being.
• The shared living space blurs the boundaries between work and personal life, eliminating the psychological buffer that exists in most professions.

Leadership’s ripple effect

Research suggests that fire service officers have a disproportionate impact on the psychological climate of their crews compared to supervisors in other fields (13). This creates a multiplier effect where:

• Officers lacking emotional intelligence skills can unknowingly amplify stress throughout their teams.
• Leadership approaches that discourage help-seeking behavior create barriers to early intervention.
• The paramilitary structure means subordinates have limited ability to distance themselves from toxic leadership.

While military and law enforcement share similar hierarchical structures, the extended time firefighters spend together in shared living quarters magnifies leadership’s impact on mental health — creating both unique vulnerability and unique opportunity for positive intervention.

Society’s role in firefighter mental health

Unique societal factors contribute to the mental health challenges firefighters face.

The paradox of public perception

Firefighters operate under contradictory public expectations that create psychological strain:

• Communities expect superhuman performance while providing increasingly limited resources.
• The public narrative of heroism creates barriers to acknowledging human limitations.
• Firefighters witness the consequences of societal problems while having minimal authority to address root causes.

Research demonstrates that this paradox creates what experts term moral injury — psychological harm resulting from actions (or lack of action) that violate one’s core moral beliefs (14). This occurs when firefighters:

• Must triage limited resources in mass casualty incidents.
• Respond repeatedly to preventable emergencies without the authority to implement prevention.
• Witness suffering they cannot alleviate despite their training and commitment.

Unlike healthcare professionals who can refer patients to specialized resources or law enforcement officers who can enforce legal consequences, firefighters often operate in a response vacuum — witnessing society’s failures repeatedly without recourse to address root causes. This creates a form of moral injury specific to our profession.

The changing nature of emergency response

The evolution of the fire service from primarily fire suppression to all-hazards emergency response has created new psychological challenges:

• Expanded mission scope without proportional increases in training or resources.
• Increased exposure to non-fire emergencies where outcomes are less controllable.
• Growing proportion of medical and social service calls that create different psychological impacts than traditional firefighting.

This mission expansion correlates directly with increasing rates of burnout and compassion fatigue, according to longitudinal research (15).

A 15-year veteran recently confided, “I signed up to fight fires, but now we’re social workers, substance abuse counselors, and mental health first responders — all without adequate training.” This mission distinguishes firefighting from other emergency services that maintain more consistent role definitions over time.

Reimagining solutions: Addressing root causes

To meaningfully address mental health in the fire service, we must move beyond resilience training and post-incident interventions to tackle these underlying issues:

Cultural evolution, not revolution

Creating sustainable change requires a nuanced approach that:

• Preserves the positive aspects of fire service culture while eliminating harmful elements.
• Reframes help-seeking as a professional responsibility rather than personal weakness.
• Develops what experts term “psychological flexibility” — the ability to shift between operational stoicism and emotional processing as appropriate (16).

Implementation strategy: Establish department-wide “culture audits” using validated assessment tools like the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) to identify specific cultural elements that support or undermine mental health. Conduct these assessments annually to measure progress and adjust strategies.
Success metrics:

• 50% increase in help-seeking behaviors within 18 months.
• 30% reduction in reported stigma around mental health discussions.
• Retention of core positive cultural elements as measured by annual surveys.

Leadership development for psychological safety

Research demonstrates that psychological safety — the belief that one won’t be punished for speaking up — is the single strongest predictor of team performance and well-being (17). Fire service leaders need:

• Training in creating psychological safety within their crews.
• Skills to recognize early warning signs of mental health challenges.
• Authority to implement structural changes that support recovery and processing.

Implementation strategy: Create a “Psychological Safety Leadership Certification” required for all officer promotions, including both classroom training and practical demonstration of skills. Pair this with regular 360-degree feedback assessments for all officers that include specific psychological safety metrics.

Success metrics:

• 100% of officers certified within two years.
• 40% improvement in psychological safety scores in crew assessments.
• 25% reduction in reported mental health incidents.

Are firefighters truly unique?

The persistent mental health challenges in the fire service stem from a unique confluence of cultural, operational, and societal factors that create vulnerabilities that few other professions experience. While individual elements may exist in other high-stress occupations, the specific combination of factors — identity fusion, interrupted recovery cycles, close-quarters emotional contagion, and expanding mission parameters — creates a mental health vulnerability profile truly unique to firefighting.

By understanding these root causes, we can move beyond treating symptoms toward addressing the underlying conditions that create them. The solutions proposed here don’t merely adapt approaches from other fields but recognize and address the distinct nature of the firefighter experience.

I challenge every member of the fire service to ask themselves: What aspects of our culture truly make us more effective, and which merely perpetuate harm under the guise of tradition? Only by confronting this question honestly can we create a fire service that sustains both the communities we serve and the firefighters who dedicate their lives to that service.

The measure of our profession’s greatness has never been our willingness to sacrifice our lives in the line of duty. Rather, it is our capacity to adapt, evolve, and protect our most valuable resource — the men and women who answer the call every day. The true test of our courage isn’t running into burning buildings, it’s having the strength to challenge our most deeply held assumptions when evidence shows they no longer serve us.

About the author
Marc Wysocki is a captain with the Sheffield Volunteer Fire Department in Massachusetts.

References

1. National Fire Protection Association. (2023). Firefighter behavioral health: A call to action.
2. Carleton, R. N., et al. (2023). Mental health disorders among public safety personnel in Canada. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 68(3), 254–264.
3. Haugen, P. T., McCrillis, A. M., Smid, G. E., & Nijdam, M. J. (2022). Mental health stigma and barriers to care in first responders: A systematic review. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 150, 38–48.
4. Hom, M. A., Stanley, I. H., Ringer, F. B., & Joiner, T. E. (2023). Mental health service use among firefighters: Barriers and recommendations. Psychiatric Services, 74(3), 267–273.
5. Joannou, M., Besemann, M., & Kriellaars, D. (2022). The impact of identity disruption in firefighters: A qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 15762.
6. Brown, B. (2023). Atlas of the heart: Mapping meaningful connection and the language of human experience. Random House.
7. Kamena, M. D., Galvez, T., & Fay, J. (2022). First responder identity: Implications for treatment following career-ending incidents. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience, 24(8), 1–9.
8. O’Donnell, K., Brydon, L., Wright, C. E., & Steptoe, A. (2023). Self-reported stress and cortisol responses in firefighters. Stress and Health, 39(1), 104–114.
9. Wolkow, A. P., Barger, L. K., O’Brien, C. S., Sullivan, J. P., Qadri, S., Lockley, S. W., Czeisler, C. A., & Rajaratnam, S. M. W. (2022). Impact of sleep restriction and recovery on cardiac stress in firefighters. Journal of Sleep Research, 31(4), e13531.
10. Walker, A., McKune, A., Ferguson, S., Pyne, D. B., & Rattray, B. (2023). Sleep quality relationships with mental health outcomes in firefighters. Sleep Medicine, 103, 154–161.
11. Sawhney, G., Jennings, K. S., Britt, T. W., & Sliter, M. T. (2022). Occupational stress and mental health symptoms: Examining the moderating effect of work recovery strategies in firefighters. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 27(1), 35–49.
12. Wild, J., El-Salahi, S., & Degli Esposti, M. (2022). The influence of social support on psychological distress in high-risk occupations: A systematic review. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 13(1), 2047832.
13. Sienkiewicz, H., Smith, P., & Siddaway, A. P. (2023). The association between leadership style and subordinate mental health in emergency services: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 149(7–8), 423–447.
14. Griffin, B. J., Purcell, N., Burkman, K., Litz, B. T., Bryan, C. J., Schmitz, M., Villierme, C., Walsh, J., & Maguen, S. (2022). Moral injury: An integrative review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 35(2), 643–658.
15. Jones, S., Nagel, C., McSweeney, J., & Curran, G. (2023). Prevalence and correlates of burnout among US firefighters: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 163.
16. Restubog, S. L. D., Ocampo, A. C. G., & Wang, L. (2022). Taking control amidst the chaos: Emotion regulation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 128, 103568.
17. Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2023). Creating psychological safety in organizations: Evidence-based practices. Harvard Business Review, 101(3), 120–130.
18. Deuster, P. A., & Hoch, E. (2022). Psychological fitness in special operations forces: The emergence of mental performance programs. Journal of Special Operations Medicine, 22(4), 98–104.