| Editor’s note: Commentators at FireRescue1’s new blog, The Kitchen Table are weighing in on the ‘two-hatter’ debate. Read blogger Art Goodrich’s take, ‘Why Legislate Against Volunteerism?’ and voice your opinion at The Kitchen Table. |
By Jamie Thompson
FireRescue1 Editor
WASHINGTON, DC — The IAFF has clashed with the IAFC over its decision to back the rights of firefighters to become “two-hatters.”
On Friday, the IAFC released a position statement on the rights of volunteer, career, and paid-on-call firefighters to serve multiple organizations or communities.
In an open letter to the IAFC, Harold A. Schaitberger, General President of the IAFF, responded Tuesday by saying “this is not an issue that welcomes or warrants an opinion from the IAFC.”
He went on to call the statement an attempt to “meddle” in the IAFF’s internal affairs.
According to Schaitberger, the IAFF’s clear position remains that secondary employment of IAFF members – including part-time, paid-on-call or volunteer -- as a firefighter or other public safety worker is wrong, unsafe and against the IAFF’s constitution.
In the IAFC’s original statement, the group said it recommends that no membership organization should restrict the right to serve in multiple organizations or communities.
“Each man and woman who chooses to live a life of volunteer service does so out of a selfless and personal commitment,” it said. “It should not be incumbent upon any organization to dictate or influence the extent of this deeply personal act.”
Writing on FireRescue1’s new blog, The Kitchen Table, Art Goodrich has offered his perspective on the debate.
“I don’t believe that it is wise to volunteer in the rural portion of the municipal department that a firefighter works full time for, but I see nothing wrong with that same firefighter volunteering outside of the community where he works. It should be his/her individual right to volunteer or not.”
Full TKT Post: Why Legislate Against Volunteerism?